SONU ANANTA JADHAV @ RAJ vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/1542/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section U/S. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010234122026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/9727/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

IA/1542/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

11th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section U/S

Petitioner(s)

SONU ANANTA JADHAV @ RAJ

Adv. SHAIKH MOHSIN MOHAMMED UMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

The Bombay High Court allowed Sonu Ananta Jadhav's interim application seeking condonation of 146 days' delay in filing a criminal appeal against his October 2025 conviction in MCOC Special Case No.158 of 2021. The court found the applicant's reasons justifiable—particularly that he had completed his substantive sentence and remained in custody due to inability to pay the fine—and condoned the delay to advance substantive justice. The criminal appeal was registered and scheduled for admission hearing on 9 July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Sonu Ananta Jadhav's interim application seeking condonation of 146 days' delay in filing a criminal appeal against his October 2025 conviction in MCOC Special Case No.158 of 2021. The court found the applicant's reasons justifiable—particularly that he had completed his substantive sentence and remained in custody due to inability to pay the fine—and condoned the delay to advance substantive justice. The criminal appeal was registered and scheduled for admission hearing on 9 July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case