RAMKRUSHNA DILIP ANKUSH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/1251/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010233842026

Filing Number

ABA/9708/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

ABA/1251/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,78,308(2),308(3),351(2),3(5)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act 2012 Section 4,6,8,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMKRUSHNA DILIP ANKUSH

    Adv. Adv Amey Sirsikar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

    This is a common order from the Bombay High Court dated 7th May 2026 addressing multiple matters in criminal appellate jurisdiction. The case ABA/1251/2026 (Ramkrushna Dilip Ankush v. State of Maharashtra) could not be heard due to court timing constraints. The court directed removal of office objections within one week, filing of affidavits-in-reply within one week, and matters with pending service notices to be listed after service is completed. Cases were adjourned to 15th and 16th June 2026 for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/1251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

This is a common order from the Bombay High Court dated 7th May 2026 addressing multiple matters in criminal appellate jurisdiction. The case ABA/1251/2026 (Ramkrushna Dilip Ankush v. State of Maharashtra) could not be heard due to court timing constraints. The court directed removal of office objections within one week, filing of affidavits-in-reply within one week, and matters with pending service notices to be listed after service is completed. Cases were adjourned to 15th and 16th June 2026 for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case