MEDHA MAHADEO RANE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. G. P. AND ORS — WP/6533/2026
Case under Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010233782026
Filing Number
WP/13672/2026
Filing Date
05-05-2026
Registration No
WP/6533/2026
Registration Date
07-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Bench Type
Division
Category
JUDICIARY LITIGATION ( 60 )
Sub-Category
Appointments in District Court ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MEDHA MAHADEO RANE
Adv. TRUPTI NANDOSKAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. G. P. AND ORS
REGISTRAR GENERAL OF HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Medha Mahadeo Rane seeking permission to appear for a preliminary examination scheduled for May 10, 2026. The petitioner's application deadline had passed on February 17, 2026, but she filed the petition on May 5, 2026—over two months late—claiming her payment was rejected due to online form generation issues. The court found her explanation unbelievable and concluded the petition lacked bona fide, dismissing it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Medha Mahadeo Rane seeking permission to appear for a preliminary examination scheduled for May 10, 2026. The petitioner's application deadline had passed on February 17, 2026, but she filed the petition on May 5, 2026—over two months late—claiming her payment was rejected due to online form generation issues. The court found her explanation unbelievable and concluded the petition lacked bona fide, dismissing it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts