MEDHA MAHADEO RANE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. G. P. AND ORS — WP/6533/2026

Case under Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010233782026

Filing Number

WP/13672/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

WP/6533/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Division

Category

JUDICIARY LITIGATION ( 60 )

Sub-Category

Appointments in District Court ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEDHA MAHADEO RANE

    Adv. TRUPTI NANDOSKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. G. P. AND ORS

  2. 2.REGISTRAR GENERAL OF HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY

  3. 3.STATE BANK OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Medha Mahadeo Rane seeking permission to appear for a preliminary examination scheduled for May 10, 2026. The petitioner's application deadline had passed on February 17, 2026, but she filed the petition on May 5, 2026—over two months late—claiming her payment was rejected due to online form generation issues. The court found her explanation unbelievable and concluded the petition lacked bona fide, dismissing it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6533/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Medha Mahadeo Rane seeking permission to appear for a preliminary examination scheduled for May 10, 2026. The petitioner's application deadline had passed on February 17, 2026, but she filed the petition on May 5, 2026—over two months late—claiming her payment was rejected due to online form generation issues. The court found her explanation unbelievable and concluded the petition lacked bona fide, dismissing it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case