BHAGWANDAS NARSINGHANI DECD THROU. L.H.(Legal Heir) vs PRABHU MULCHAND NARSINGHANI AND ORS — WP/7294/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010232902026

Filing Number

WP/13613/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

WP/7294/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAGWANDAS NARSINGHANI DECD THROU. L.H.(Legal Heir)

    Adv. SB 1.

  2. 2.PUSHPA BHAGWANDAS NARSINGHANI1.

  3. 3.RAKESH BHAGWANDAS NARSINGHANI1.

  4. 4.GIRISH BHAGWANDAS NARSINGHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRABHU MULCHAND NARSINGHANI AND ORS

  2. 2.CHANDUMAL MULCHAND NARSINGHANI

  3. 3.PREM MULCHAND NARSINGHANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition and directed the Civil Judge at Pimpri, Pune to expeditiously proceed with RCS No.319 of 2016, finding no legal impediment to continuation since the Plaintiffs had not filed the promised transfer application nor obtained stay orders from superior court. The court rejected the delay caused by the Plaintiffs' unfulfilled statement regarding transfer proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7294/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition and directed the Civil Judge at Pimpri, Pune to expeditiously proceed with RCS No.319 of 2016, finding no legal impediment to continuation since the Plaintiffs had not filed the promised transfer application nor obtained stay orders from superior court. The court rejected the delay caused by the Plaintiffs' unfulfilled statement regarding transfer proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case