SHAILENDRA ANAVKAR AND ORS vs DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OP SOC AND ORS — WP/6464/2026
Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010232532026
Filing Number
WP/13592/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WP/6464/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Cooperative Socities ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAILENDRA ANAVKAR AND ORS
Adv. abhishek deshmukh
-
2.SUDHAKAR GANGARAM SHITUT
-
3.KAMLAKANT SITARAM THAKUR
-
4.MANSING SHANKAR CHAVAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OP SOC AND ORS
-
2.SHREE SWAMI SAMARTH SADAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD
-
3.KASHIRAM KUBAL
Adv. Rajas,Rohit Parab
-
4.SAMIR SAWANT
Adv. Rajas,Rohit Parab
-
5.THE JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY GREATER MUMBAI
-
6.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
27-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Jul-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/6464/2026 The Bombay High Court found that petitioners satisfied statutory compliance requirements under Sections 75 and 82, but authorities issued a factually incorrect disqualification order and exceeded their jurisdiction by considering non-compliance for 2024-2025 when the show-cause notice was restricted to prior periods. The court ordered respondents 1 and 5 to file personal affidavits explaining why departmental inquiry should not be initiated, granted ad-interim relief to petitioners, and adjourned the case to July 27, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6464/2026
Case Summary: WP/6464/2026 The Bombay High Court found that petitioners satisfied statutory compliance requirements under Sections 75 and 82, but authorities issued a factually incorrect disqualification order and exceeded their jurisdiction by considering non-compliance for 2024-2025 when the show-cause notice was restricted to prior periods. The court ordered respondents 1 and 5 to file personal affidavits explaining why departmental inquiry should not be initiated, granted ad-interim relief to petitioners, and adjourned the case to July 27, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts