SHAILENDRA ANAVKAR AND ORS vs DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OP SOC AND ORS — WP/6464/2026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010232532026

Next Hearing

27th July 2026

Filing Number

WP/13592/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

WP/6464/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SHAILENDRA ANAVKAR AND ORS

Adv. abhishek deshmukh

SUDHAKAR GANGARAM SHITUT

KAMLAKANT SITARAM THAKUR

MANSING SHANKAR CHAVAN

Respondent(s)

DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OP SOC AND ORS

SHREE SWAMI SAMARTH SADAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

KASHIRAM KUBAL

Adv. Rajas,Rohit Parab

SAMIR SAWANT

Adv. Rajas,Rohit Parab

THE JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY GREATER MUMBAI

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

07-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

27-07-2026

FOR ADMISSION

08-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Case Summary: WP/6464/2026 The Bombay High Court found that petitioners satisfied statutory compliance requirements under Sections 75 and 82, but authorities issued a factually incorrect disqualification order and exceeded their jurisdiction by considering non-compliance for 2024-2025 when the show-cause notice was restricted to prior periods. The court ordered respondents 1 and 5 to file personal affidavits explaining why departmental inquiry should not be initiated, granted ad-interim relief to petitioners, and adjourned the case to July 27, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6464/2026 The Bombay High Court found that petitioners satisfied statutory compliance requirements under Sections 75 and 82, but authorities issued a factually incorrect disqualification order and exceeded their jurisdiction by considering non-compliance for 2024-2025 when the show-cause notice was restricted to prior periods. The court ordered respondents 1 and 5 to file personal affidavits explaining why departmental inquiry should not be initiated, granted ad-interim relief to petitioners, and adjourned the case to July 27, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case