Devanshu B Rathod vs The University of Mumbai, Through its Registrar — IA/3513/2026

Case under University Act (Maharashtra) Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010231982026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

IA/13547/2026

Filing Date

04-05-2026

Registration No

IA/3513/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

University Act (Maharashtra) Section 226
Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Devanshu B Rathod

Adv. NARGOLKAR

Respondent(s)

The University of Mumbai, Through its Registrar

The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

The Bombay High Court granted Devanshu Rathod's interim application, allowing him to appear in examinations for the remaining 3 subjects of his 2nd year and all 3rd year subjects in May 2026, subject to the college verifying that he cleared all 1st year backlogs and 8 of 11 second-year subjects, and met attendance requirements. The court also directed the student to join his college as a party respondent to the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted Devanshu Rathod's interim application, allowing him to appear in examinations for the remaining 3 subjects of his 2nd year and all 3rd year subjects in May 2026, subject to the college verifying that he cleared all 1st year backlogs and 8 of 11 second-year subjects, and met attendance requirements. The court also directed the student to join his college as a party respondent to the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case