MOHAN HARI KADAM vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND ORS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS — WP/12886/2025
Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010231482025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/14782/2025
Filing Date
23-04-2025
Registration No
WP/12886/2025
Registration Date
03-10-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
MHADA ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAN HARI KADAM
Adv. viraj,Nitan D Mayekar,Nitan D Mayekar, ,Nitan D Mayekar
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND ORS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS
MAMTA MILIND RANE
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BUILDING PROPOSALS
THE MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FLOREAT INVESTMENT LIMITED
Adv. Diamondwala and Co
THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2025 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 01-07-2025 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
| 07-10-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 16-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 10-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/12886/2025 Outcome: Case adjourned. The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 16/06/2026. The State's counsel waived service; MHADA counsel was directed to seek instructions. Private notice permitted on respondents 2, 3, 5, and 6. Matter listed for 16/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/12886/2025 Outcome: Case adjourned. The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 16/06/2026. The State's counsel waived service; MHADA counsel was directed to seek instructions. Private notice permitted on respondents 2, 3, 5, and 6. Matter listed for 16/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts