SMT. BHIMAVVA THIPPANNA TUMKUR AND ANR. vs M/S. SURYA CARGO CARRIERS AND ANR. — CAF/859/2018
Case under Workmens Compensation Act Section 30. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010231442016
Filing Number
CAF/15401/2016
Filing Date
07-Jun-2016
Registration No
CAF/859/2018
Registration Date
01-Mar-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. BHIMAVVA THIPPANNA TUMKUR AND ANR.
Adv. TJMENDON
-
2.SMT. BHARATHI HANUMANTHAPPA GOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. SURYA CARGO CARRIERS AND ANR.
-
2.NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner's dismissal of the parents' workman's compensation claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The court found that while a dependency issue was framed, no specific issue was framed regarding proof of relationship, preventing the parents from testifying; given this is social welfare legislation, justice required remand for proper evidence on relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
-
16-Feb-2024
For Orders (Regular)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
12-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
14-Jun-2023
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan
-
03-May-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. ChavanView PDF
-
30-Mar-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. ChavanView PDF
-
28-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jun-2016
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/859/2018
The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner's dismissal of the parents' workman's compensation claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The court found that while a dependency issue was framed, no specific issue was framed regarding proof of relationship, preventing the parents from testifying; given this is social welfare legislation, justice required remand for proper evidence on relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts