SMT. BHIMAVVA THIPPANNA TUMKUR AND ANR. vs M/S. SURYA CARGO CARRIERS AND ANR. — CAF/859/2018

Case under Workmens Compensation Act Section 30. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010231442016

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

12th December 1212

Filing Number

CAF/15401/2016

Filing Date

07-06-2016

Registration No

CAF/859/2018

Registration Date

01-03-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Workmens Compensation Act Section 30

Petitioner(s)

SMT. BHIMAVVA THIPPANNA TUMKUR AND ANR.

Adv. TJMENDON

SMT. BHARATHI HANUMANTHAPPA GOWDA

Respondent(s)

M/S. SURYA CARGO CARRIERS AND ANR.

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

28-01-2021

APPEALS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

15-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

16-02-2024

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

14-06-2023

DUE ADMISSION - 1

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner's dismissal of the parents' workman's compensation claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The court found that while a dependency issue was framed, no specific issue was framed regarding proof of relationship, preventing the parents from testifying; given this is social welfare legislation, justice required remand for proper evidence on relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner's dismissal of the parents' workman's compensation claim and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The court found that while a dependency issue was framed, no specific issue was framed regarding proof of relationship, preventing the parents from testifying; given this is social welfare legislation, justice required remand for proper evidence on relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case