MR. PRAMOD PRAKASH MITRA vs MRS. ANNI W/O. GRACIAN HENRIQUWA — IA/3991/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010231062026

Filing Number

IA/13482/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

IA/3991/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. PRAMOD PRAKASH MITRA

    Adv. M P Mhatre

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MRS. ANNI W/O. GRACIAN HENRIQUWA

  2. 2.MR. JOEYACE S/O GRACIAN HENRIQUES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: Mitra v. Anni & Anr. (IA 3991/2026) The Bombay High Court allowed Pramod Prakash Mitra's appeal against the Trial Court's rejection of interim relief regarding property CTS No. 164. The court directed the City Survey Officer to measure and map the disputed property within two weeks (at plaintiff's cost), with measurement conducted in presence of all parties, and the resulting map submitted to the Trial Court in a sealed envelope. The Trial Court will then decide the underlying motion (Notice of Motion No. 975/2026) based on the measurement report and completed pleadings, with all substantive contentions kept open for final adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3991/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mitra v. Anni & Anr. (IA 3991/2026) The Bombay High Court allowed Pramod Prakash Mitra's appeal against the Trial Court's rejection of interim relief regarding property CTS No. 164. The court directed the City Survey Officer to measure and map the disputed property within two weeks (at plaintiff's cost), with measurement conducted in presence of all parties, and the resulting map submitted to the Trial Court in a sealed envelope. The Trial Court will then decide the underlying motion (Notice of Motion No. 975/2026) based on the measurement report and completed pleadings, with all substantive contentions kept open for final adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case