MR. PRAMOD PRAKASH MITRA vs MRS. ANNI W/O. GRACIAN HENRIQUWA — AO/575/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010231052026

Filing Number

AO/13481/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

AO/575/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. PRAMOD PRAKASH MITRA

    Adv. M P Mhatre

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MRS. ANNI W/O. GRACIAN HENRIQUWA

  2. 2.MR. JOEYACE S/O GRACIAN HENRIQUES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: Mitra v. Anni & Anr. (AO/575/2026) The Bombay High Court allowed Pramod Prakash Mitra's appeal against the Trial Court's rejection of interim relief in a property dispute involving Survey No. 164. The court directed the City Survey Officer to measure and map the plaintiff's property within two weeks, with costs borne by the plaintiff, noting the officer's earlier refusal to conduct measurement without court order was procedurally incorrect. The Trial Court is directed to decide the substantive motion on merits after pleadings are completed, with all contentions kept open and uninfluenced by previous orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/575/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mitra v. Anni & Anr. (AO/575/2026) The Bombay High Court allowed Pramod Prakash Mitra's appeal against the Trial Court's rejection of interim relief in a property dispute involving Survey No. 164. The court directed the City Survey Officer to measure and map the plaintiff's property within two weeks, with costs borne by the plaintiff, noting the officer's earlier refusal to conduct measurement without court order was procedurally incorrect. The Trial Court is directed to decide the substantive motion on merits after pleadings are completed, with all contentions kept open and uninfluenced by previous orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case