SWAPNIL BALASAHEB PINGALE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/1533/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010230922026

Filing Number

IA/9620/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

IA/1533/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Others ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 110, 125A, 125(B), 281, 324(4)
Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 119, 177, 184, 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWAPNIL BALASAHEB PINGALE

    Adv. PRIYAL G SARDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/1533/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Swapnil Balasaheb Pingale's interim application seeking extension of temporary bail granted on account of his marriage and post-marriage ceremonies. Justice Shivkumar Dige extended the temporary bail until 7th June, 2026, with the condition that the applicant shall surrender before the jail authority on that date, despite the State's objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1533/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/1533/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Swapnil Balasaheb Pingale's interim application seeking extension of temporary bail granted on account of his marriage and post-marriage ceremonies. Justice Shivkumar Dige extended the temporary bail until 7th June, 2026, with the condition that the applicant shall surrender before the jail authority on that date, despite the State's objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case