POOJA SIDDHARTH VARDEKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/1242/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010230542026
Filing Number
ABA/9603/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
ABA/1242/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.POOJA SIDDHARTH VARDEKAR
Adv. fauzan
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/1242/2026 This was a common order issued by the Bombay High Court on 7th May 2026 addressing multiple matters that could not be heard due to court time constraints. The case was adjourned with directions: office objections must be removed within one week, Affidavits-in-Reply/Rejoinder to be filed within one week, and matters are listed for hearing on 15/06/2026 and 16/06/2026. Any petitioner failing to supply spare copies for notice issuance within 7 days faces dismissal against unserved respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/1242/2026
Case Summary: ABA/1242/2026 This was a common order issued by the Bombay High Court on 7th May 2026 addressing multiple matters that could not be heard due to court time constraints. The case was adjourned with directions: office objections must be removed within one week, Affidavits-in-Reply/Rejoinder to be filed within one week, and matters are listed for hearing on 15/06/2026 and 16/06/2026. Any petitioner failing to supply spare copies for notice issuance within 7 days faces dismissal against unserved respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts