DINESH PRAKASH MUDIRAJ vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/1230/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010230372026
Filing Number
ABA/9593/2026
Filing Date
04-05-2026
Registration No
ABA/1230/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DINESH PRAKASH MUDIRAJ
Adv. Abdul Wahab Shaikh
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: ABA/1230/2026 The Bombay High Court rejected Dinesh Prakash Mudiraj's anticipatory bail application in a case involving organized human trafficking for prostitution at his spa center in Kashimira, Thane. While the applicant claimed ignorance of illegal activities, the court found a prima facie case based on victim statements, CDR evidence linking his involvement, and the fact that he retained majority payments while victims received only Rs. 1,500 per transaction. The court authorized custodial interrogation, considering the grave nature of the organized trafficking offence and exploitation of vulnerable women. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABA/1230/2026 The Bombay High Court rejected Dinesh Prakash Mudiraj's anticipatory bail application in a case involving organized human trafficking for prostitution at his spa center in Kashimira, Thane. While the applicant claimed ignorance of illegal activities, the court found a prima facie case based on victim statements, CDR evidence linking his involvement, and the fact that he retained majority payments while victims received only Rs. 1,500 per transaction. The court authorized custodial interrogation, considering the grave nature of the organized trafficking offence and exploitation of vulnerable women. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts