THE NASHIK DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LIMITED vs ASSTT, PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER RECOVERY OFFICER AND ORS — WP/6526/2026

Case under Employee Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act Section na. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010229972026

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

Filing Number

WP/13417/2026

Filing Date

04-05-2026

Registration No

WP/6526/2026

Registration Date

07-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Sub-Category

PROVIDENT FUND ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Employee Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

THE NASHIK DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LIMITED

Adv. Vishal Tambat

Respondent(s)

ASSTT, PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER RECOVERY OFFICER AND ORS

NASHIK SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD PALSE THR. IS LIQUIDATOR

ASHTALAXMI SUGAR, ETHANOL AND ENERGY LTD

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

08-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

17-07-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition by Nashik District Central Cooperative Bank Limited challenging an order issued against it as a secured creditor under Section 17B of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952. The court granted leave to amend the petition, issued notice to respondents returnable on July 17, 2026, and granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c) pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition by Nashik District Central Cooperative Bank Limited challenging an order issued against it as a secured creditor under Section 17B of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952. The court granted leave to amend the petition, issued notice to respondents returnable on July 17, 2026, and granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c) pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case