SAYYED ASGAR HUSSAINI AND ANR. vs ARSHAD RAFIQUE CHAROLIA AND ANR. — IA/3466/2026
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010229542026
Filing Number
IA/13391/2026
Filing Date
04-05-2026
Registration No
IA/3466/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONS ( 67 )
Sub-Category
Against Order of Presidency / Provincial Small Causes Courts under the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAYYED ASGAR HUSSAINI AND ANR.
Adv. Vasim A Shaikh
SHABANA SAYED HUSSAINI
Respondent(s)
ARSHAD RAFIQUE CHAROLIA AND ANR.
RASHID RAFIQUE CHAROLI
Orders
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the tenants' (Applicants') revision application challenging an eviction decree for default in rent payment under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court upheld concurrent findings that the defendants failed to deposit the complete arrears of rent (Rs.38,025), 15% interest (Rs.11,407), and costs within 90 days as required by Section 15(3)—a Rs.5,702 deficit existed. The court rejected arguments that this minuscule shortfall should be ignored, noting it equaled over six months of rent and the tenants also defaulted on deposits for five years during appeal proceedings. Eviction decree upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the tenants' (Applicants') revision application challenging an eviction decree for default in rent payment under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court upheld concurrent findings that the defendants failed to deposit the complete arrears of rent (Rs.38,025), 15% interest (Rs.11,407), and costs within 90 days as required by Section 15(3)—a Rs.5,702 deficit existed. The court rejected arguments that this minuscule shortfall should be ignored, noting it equaled over six months of rent and the tenants also defaulted on deposits for five years during appeal proceedings. Eviction decree upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts