AMANDEEP JAGJITSINGH MANAKTALA AND ORS vs AMRIT KAUR W/O AMANDEEP SINGH — APL/923/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010229532026
Filing Number
APL/9564/2026
Filing Date
04-05-2026
Registration No
APL/923/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMANDEEP JAGJITSINGH MANAKTALA AND ORS
Adv. Adv Tarun Shrivastava
JAGJIT SINGH MANAKTALA
JYOTI @ VARINDER KAUR JAGJITSINGH MANAKTALA
Respondent(s)
AMRIT KAUR W/O AMANDEEP SINGH
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: APL/923/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed the criminal application to quash proceedings in Case No. 2122/PW/2022 arising from FIR No. 49 of 2022. The applicant and his wife, who were married in 2018, had filed an FIR due to marital discord but subsequently settled their disputes and filed for mutual consent divorce in Family Court with agreed settlement terms of Rs. 5 lakhs, which was already deposited. The respondent-wife consented to quashing the criminal proceedings, and the court approved the application with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APL/923/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed the criminal application to quash proceedings in Case No. 2122/PW/2022 arising from FIR No. 49 of 2022. The applicant and his wife, who were married in 2018, had filed an FIR due to marital discord but subsequently settled their disputes and filed for mutual consent divorce in Family Court with agreed settlement terms of Rs. 5 lakhs, which was already deposited. The respondent-wife consented to quashing the criminal proceedings, and the court approved the application with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts