THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, PUNE AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — IA/3518/2026

Case under Bombay Village Panchayat Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010229482026

Filing Number

IA/13386/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

IA/3518/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Village Panchayat Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, PUNE AND ANR

    Adv. Ashwin R Kapadnis

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the interim application filed by the CEO, Zilla Parishad, Pune, granting an extension of 60 days for compliance with a court order dated 04.03.2026. The court found the application acceptable because the Zilla Parishad was providing hearings to all 61 gala (plot) holders involved in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Urgent Order

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3518/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the interim application filed by the CEO, Zilla Parishad, Pune, granting an extension of 60 days for compliance with a court order dated 04.03.2026. The court found the application acceptable because the Zilla Parishad was providing hearings to all 61 gala (plot) holders involved in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case