MRIDULA SANJEEV KANDELWAL AND ANR vs COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ANR — WP/6284/2026

Case under Rent Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010229352026

Filing Number

WP/13377/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP/6284/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Rent Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRIDULA SANJEEV KANDELWAL AND ANR

    Adv. Darshna Naval

  2. 2.SAMRIDH SANJEEV KHANDELWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ANR

  2. 2.SAJID JAMSHED ALI SYED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/6284/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of the petitioners' writ petition challenging the Competent Authority's possession warrant order. The court found the petition unnecessary, holding that the Competent Authority correctly issued the warrant because petitioners failed to deposit the Rs. 2 crore security deposit mandated by the February 2025 eviction order within the stipulated 30 days. The court allowed the petitioners to deposit Rs. 1,77,08,000 (security deposit minus Rs. 22,92,000 in damages at Rs. 40,000/month from July 2021 to May 2026) by May 13, 2026, after which the possession warrant would proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6284/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6284/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of the petitioners' writ petition challenging the Competent Authority's possession warrant order. The court found the petition unnecessary, holding that the Competent Authority correctly issued the warrant because petitioners failed to deposit the Rs. 2 crore security deposit mandated by the February 2025 eviction order within the stipulated 30 days. The court allowed the petitioners to deposit Rs. 1,77,08,000 (security deposit minus Rs. 22,92,000 in damages at Rs. 40,000/month from July 2021 to May 2026) by May 13, 2026, after which the possession warrant would proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case