Venkateshwara Sand Suppliers through Mr Ganesh Bajrang Nalawde Rathod Harsh Sanjay vs Vikas Kharge — CP/283/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010228842026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

CP/13340/2026

Filing Date

04-05-2026

Registration No

CP/283/2026

Registration Date

04-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT Section 10

Petitioner(s)

Venkateshwara Sand Suppliers through Mr Ganesh Bajrang Nalawde Rathod Harsh Sanjay

Respondent(s)

Vikas Kharge

Dr Umesh B Rathod

Minakshi Mane

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

05-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Summary of CP/283/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of Venkateshwara Sand Suppliers' contempt petition by directing the District Mining Officer, Satara to deliver Rs. 1,40,02,788 to the petitioner's authorized representative without requiring any undertaking, merely acknowledging receipt. The court affirmed the petitioner's right to avail of liberties granted under the underlying writ order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CP/283/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of Venkateshwara Sand Suppliers' contempt petition by directing the District Mining Officer, Satara to deliver Rs. 1,40,02,788 to the petitioner's authorized representative without requiring any undertaking, merely acknowledging receipt. The court affirmed the petitioner's right to avail of liberties granted under the underlying writ order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Contempt of Courts Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case