THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT.PLEADER vs RAMRAO PATILBUV PURKAR 1. — CAF/210/2021
Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010227882010
Filing Number
CAF/15556/2010
Filing Date
23-Jun-2010
Registration No
CAF/210/2021
Registration Date
04-Aug-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Land Aquisition - Single Bench ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT.PLEADER
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMRAO PATILBUV PURKAR 1.
-
2.KAMAL RAMRAO PURKAR (SINCE DECEASED THR. LRS.)(Legal Heir)1.1.
-
3.PRAMILA SOMNATH KAWALE1.1.
-
4.BHARAT RAMRAO PURKAR1.1.
-
5.RAMESH RAMRAO PURKAR1.1.
-
6.PRAGATI VITTAL WADJE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra State's First Appeal relating to Land Acquisition Reference No. 204/2000, upholding the CJSD Nashik's judgment dated October 9, 2009, which awarded Rs. 2,43,586/- to the respondent (against the land acquisition officer's initial award of Rs. 42,214/-). The court found no grounds for interference given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply with the judgment within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Aug-2025
For Orders-
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
11-Mar-2025
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
11-Feb-2025
For Orders (Ia)
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
02-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jun-2010
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/210/2021
The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra State's First Appeal relating to Land Acquisition Reference No. 204/2000, upholding the CJSD Nashik's judgment dated October 9, 2009, which awarded Rs. 2,43,586/- to the respondent (against the land acquisition officer's initial award of Rs. 42,214/-). The court found no grounds for interference given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply with the judgment within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts