THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THR. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER) GOVT.PLEADER vs GOPALA BAPU NIRGUDE (DECEASED) THR. LRS. TRIMBAK GOPALA NIRGUDE AND ANR. 1. — CAF/216/2021

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010227832010

Filing Number

CAF/15551/2010

Filing Date

23-Jun-2010

Registration No

CAF/216/2021

Registration Date

04-Aug-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Land Aquisition - Single Bench ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THR. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER) GOVT.PLEADER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPALA BAPU NIRGUDE (DECEASED) THR. LRS. TRIMBAK GOPALA NIRGUDE AND ANR. 1.

  2. 2.TRIMBAK GOPALA NIRGUDE1.

  3. 3.SHANKAR GOPALA NIRGUDE1.

  4. 4.BABURAO GOPALA NIRGUDE1.

  5. 5.LAXMIBAI SAMPAT DAVANGE (DEAD)(Legal Heir)1.4.

  6. 6.SAMPATRAO SITARAM DEVANGE1.4.

  7. 7.BHAUSAHEB SAMPATRAO DEVANGE1.4.

  8. 8.VISHAL SAMPATRAO DEVANGE1.4.

  9. 9.YOGESH SAMPATRAO DEVANGE1.4.

  10. 10.LATABAI PRAKASH MOGAL

  11. 11.KHANDU BAPU NIRGUDE (DEAD)(Legal Heir)2.

  12. 12.DINKAR KHANDERAO NIRGUDE2.

  13. 13.TARABAI PUNDALIK BHAWAR2.

  14. 14.VIMAL GOPINATH AAHIRE2.

  15. 15.HIRABAI JAYARAM SHINDE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    In this land acquisition compensation appeal, the Bombay High Court disposed of the State of Maharashtra's appeal as withdrawn. The SLAO had awarded Rs. 42,913/- compensation, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs. 1,10,236/- (marginally exceeding the State's four-times parameter policy). The court permitted withdrawal citing the marginal difference and State policy guidelines (GRs dated 2016-2018) against expending resources on such appeals, and ordered refund of court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Nov-2025

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 15-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  5. 15-Sep-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  6. 08-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  7. 17-Jul-2025

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  8. 15-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  9. 15-Apr-2025

    Due Admission -

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  10. 30-Aug-2024

    For Orders (Regular)

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  11. 31-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  12. 31-Jul-2024

    For Orders (Regular)

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  13. 12-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  14. 12-Jul-2024

    For Orders (Regular)

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  15. 28-Jun-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  16. 28-Jun-2024

    For Orders (Regular)

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  17. 18-Jun-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  18. 29-Feb-2024

    For Orders (Regular)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  19. 04-Jan-2024

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF

  20. 02-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 28-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  22. 23-Jun-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/216/2021

casestatus.in Summary

In this land acquisition compensation appeal, the Bombay High Court disposed of the State of Maharashtra's appeal as withdrawn. The SLAO had awarded Rs. 42,913/- compensation, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs. 1,10,236/- (marginally exceeding the State's four-times parameter policy). The court permitted withdrawal citing the marginal difference and State policy guidelines (GRs dated 2016-2018) against expending resources on such appeals, and ordered refund of court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case