XYZ vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/2420/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010227482026

Filing Number

WP/9483/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP/2420/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Seeking directions - offences against women and children ( 120 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,76,316,318

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.XYZ

    Adv. Satyaram Radheshyam Gaud

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

  2. 2.VIKRANT SHIRSAT

  3. 3.PSI SHUBHAM SAHEBRAO SHINDE

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/2420/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to the respondents (State of Maharashtra and others) returnable on 17th June, 2026, directing the Assistant Public Prosecutor to file an affidavit-in-reply. The petition was stood over to 17th June, 2026, with liberty granted to the petitioner to mention the matter before the Vacation Bench in case of urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2420/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/2420/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to the respondents (State of Maharashtra and others) returnable on 17th June, 2026, directing the Assistant Public Prosecutor to file an affidavit-in-reply. The petition was stood over to 17th June, 2026, with liberty granted to the petitioner to mention the matter before the Vacation Bench in case of urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case