SATISH MOHAN THORAT vs NANASAHEB KISAN NAGAWADE AND ORS — WP/6980/2026

Case under B.t. & A.l. Act Section NA. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010227282026

Filing Number

WP/13254/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP/6980/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )

Sub-Category

AGRICULTURAL LAND CEILING ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

B.t. & A.l. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH MOHAN THORAT

    Adv. Shekhar Mane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANASAHEB KISAN NAGAWADE AND ORS

  2. 2.BABAN KISAN NAGAWADE

  3. 3.GOPICHAND KISAN NAGAWADE

  4. 4.SACHIN NARAYAN JAGTAP

  5. 5.NITIN NARAYAN JAGTAP

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition to 8th June 2026, noting that despite filing on 29th April 2026, the petitioner's counsel had not served the respondents. The court conditionally extended interim reliefs previously granted by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (4th February 2026), but warned that failure to complete service by the next date would result in dismissal and rejection of any further relief applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6980/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition to 8th June 2026, noting that despite filing on 29th April 2026, the petitioner's counsel had not served the respondents. The court conditionally extended interim reliefs previously granted by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (4th February 2026), but warned that failure to complete service by the next date would result in dismissal and rejection of any further relief applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case