PRAVIN RAJARAM KEDARE vs SHITAL PRAVIN KEDARE@ SHITAL VIJAY PANPATIL — FCA/50/2026

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010226472026

Filing Number

FCA/13198/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

FCA/50/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVIN RAJARAM KEDARE

    Adv. SUMEDH S MODAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHITAL PRAVIN KEDARE@ SHITAL VIJAY PANPATIL

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jul-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

    Case Summary: FCA 50/2026 The Bombay High Court granted a stay on the Family Court's divorce decree dated 10/4/2026. The husband (appellant) challenged the mutual divorce decree and the Family Court's direction requiring him to execute a relinquishment deed transferring his 50% property share for Rs. 27,50,000, arguing he never consented in writing to these settlement terms. The High Court found merit in his contention, noting the wife's application (Exhibit-31) for conversion to Section 13B divorce was unilateral and his "No Objection" to conversion did not constitute agreement to the property conditions. The matter stands adjourned to 3/7/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FCA/50/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FCA 50/2026 The Bombay High Court granted a stay on the Family Court's divorce decree dated 10/4/2026. The husband (appellant) challenged the mutual divorce decree and the Family Court's direction requiring him to execute a relinquishment deed transferring his 50% property share for Rs. 27,50,000, arguing he never consented in writing to these settlement terms. The High Court found merit in his contention, noting the wife's application (Exhibit-31) for conversion to Section 13B divorce was unilateral and his "No Objection" to conversion did not constitute agreement to the property conditions. The matter stands adjourned to 3/7/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case