WALKESHWAR TRIVENI CO OP HSG SOC LTD vs HIMANSHU ASHOK DOSHI AND ORS — WP/6540/2026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section na. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010225542026

Filing Number

WP/13153/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6540/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WALKESHWAR TRIVENI CO OP HSG SOC LTD

    Adv. Ghanshyam Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIMANSHU ASHOK DOSHI AND ORS

  2. 2.HET ASHOK KUMAR DOSHI

  3. 3.NIKHIL KUMAR KIRTANIAL DOSHI

  4. 4.DEEPAK KIRTANLAL DOSHI

  5. 5.ANIL KUMAR KIRTANLAL DOSHI

  6. 6.MEENA BIPIN SETH

  7. 7.MALATI DEEPAK PARIKH

  8. 8.CHITRALEKHA P. PARIKH

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jul-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The Bombay High Court issued notices to Respondents 1 and 2 returnable on 8 July 2026, granted interim relief (Hamdust), and suspended the Co-operative Court's order dated 15 December 2025 pending the next hearing. The case addresses the petitioner's grievance that the lower court allowed a document production application without discussing document relevancy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6540/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court issued notices to Respondents 1 and 2 returnable on 8 July 2026, granted interim relief (Hamdust), and suspended the Co-operative Court's order dated 15 December 2025 pending the next hearing. The case addresses the petitioner's grievance that the lower court allowed a document production application without discussing document relevancy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case