KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. THR. ITS AUTHO. OFFICER vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. G. P. AND ORS — WP/6423/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010225382026

Filing Number

WP/13143/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6423/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. THR. ITS AUTHO. OFFICER

    Adv. Medha Rane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. G. P. AND ORS

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CIVIL JUDGE

  3. 3.BHAUSAHEB SHANKAR SUTAR

  4. 4.SHARDA BHAUSAHEB SUTAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Appellate Bench (Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram V. Shirsat) on June 9, 2026, found that Kotak Mahindra Bank's writ petition required single Judge consideration. The petition was removed from the division bench and directed to be placed before the appropriate single Judge bench for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6423/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Appellate Bench (Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram V. Shirsat) on June 9, 2026, found that Kotak Mahindra Bank's writ petition required single Judge consideration. The petition was removed from the division bench and directed to be placed before the appropriate single Judge bench for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case