LAKHAN MOHAN WASWANI @ PATIL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/1192/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010224472026

Filing Number

ABA/9354/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

ABA/1192/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109, 351(2), 325, 55, 3(5)
Arms Act Section 4, 25
Bombay Police Act Section 37(1), 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKHAN MOHAN WASWANI @ PATIL

    Adv. Santosh Sonawane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

    Case Summary: Lakhan Mohan Waswani @ Patil sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. I-54 of 2026 involving charges under BNS sections 109, 351(2), 325, 55, 3(5); Arms Act sections 4, 25; and Maharashtra Police Act sections 37(1), 135. After partial hearing, the applicant's counsel requested withdrawal of the application with the State's consent. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and disposed of the anticipatory bail application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/1192/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Lakhan Mohan Waswani @ Patil sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. I-54 of 2026 involving charges under BNS sections 109, 351(2), 325, 55, 3(5); Arms Act sections 4, 25; and Maharashtra Police Act sections 37(1), 135. After partial hearing, the applicant's counsel requested withdrawal of the application with the State's consent. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and disposed of the anticipatory bail application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case