Keyana Estate LLP Wadia Ghandy and Co. vs Karthiyayani R Nair Advocate - LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS, ,Law Competere Consultus,Law Competere Consultus — SA/233/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010222662026

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

SA/12986/2026

Filing Date

29-04-2026

Registration No

SA/233/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

Keyana Estate LLP Wadia Ghandy and Co.

Respondent(s)

Karthiyayani R Nair Advocate - LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS, ,Law Competere Consultus,Law Competere Consultus

Ashok Ramchandran Nair

Adv. LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

06-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

17-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Case Summary: SA 233/2026 Keyana Estate LLP v. Karthiyayani R Nair & Anr. The High Court of Bombay adjourned the second appeals (filed under the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, 2016) to 17th June 2026 for substantive hearing on whether the Authority has power to review its order under Regulation 36, Section 85. Interim relief was granted permitting respondents to withdraw the appellant's deposited amount upon furnishing an indemnity bond, ensuring repayment with interest if the appeals succeed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA 233/2026 Keyana Estate LLP v. Karthiyayani R Nair & Anr. The High Court of Bombay adjourned the second appeals (filed under the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, 2016) to 17th June 2026 for substantive hearing on whether the Authority has power to review its order under Regulation 36, Section 85. Interim relief was granted permitting respondents to withdraw the appellant's deposited amount upon furnishing an indemnity bond, ensuring repayment with interest if the appeals succeed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case