Keyana Estate LLP Wadia Ghandy and Co. vs Karthiyayani R Nair Advocate - LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS, ,Law Competere Consultus,Law Competere Consultus — SA/233/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010222662026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2026
Filing Number
SA/12986/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
SA/233/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Keyana Estate LLP Wadia Ghandy and Co.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karthiyayani R Nair Advocate - LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS, ,Law Competere Consultus,Law Competere Consultus
-
2.Ashok Ramchandran Nair
Adv. LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
Case Summary: SA 233/2026 Keyana Estate LLP v. Karthiyayani R Nair & Anr. The High Court of Bombay adjourned the second appeals (filed under the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, 2016) to 17th June 2026 for substantive hearing on whether the Authority has power to review its order under Regulation 36, Section 85. Interim relief was granted permitting respondents to withdraw the appellant's deposited amount upon furnishing an indemnity bond, ensuring repayment with interest if the appeals succeed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SA/233/2026
Case Summary: SA 233/2026 Keyana Estate LLP v. Karthiyayani R Nair & Anr. The High Court of Bombay adjourned the second appeals (filed under the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, 2016) to 17th June 2026 for substantive hearing on whether the Authority has power to review its order under Regulation 36, Section 85. Interim relief was granted permitting respondents to withdraw the appellant's deposited amount upon furnishing an indemnity bond, ensuring repayment with interest if the appeals succeed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts