KEYANA ESTATE LLP Wadia Ghandy and Co., ,Law Competere Consultus vs KARTHIYAYANI R NAIR Advocate - LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS,Law Competere Consultus,Law Competere Consultus — SA/234/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010222652026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2026
Filing Number
SA/12985/2026
Filing Date
29-04-2026
Registration No
SA/234/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KEYANA ESTATE LLP Wadia Ghandy and Co., ,Law Competere Consultus
Respondent(s)
KARTHIYAYANI R NAIR Advocate - LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS,Law Competere Consultus,Law Competere Consultus
ASHOK RAMCHANDRAN NAIR
Adv. LAW COMPETERE CONSULTUS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 17-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: SA/234/2026 Keyana Estate LLP v. Karthiyayani R Nair & Anr. The Bombay High Court adjourned the Second Appeals (SA 233 & 234 of 2026) to 17th June 2026 to consider a substantial question regarding whether the Authority has power to review its order under Regulation 36 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Interim applications were taken on board, and respondents were permitted to withdraw the appellant's deposited amount upon furnishing an indemnity bond guaranteeing repayment with interest if appeals are decided in the appellant's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SA/234/2026 Keyana Estate LLP v. Karthiyayani R Nair & Anr. The Bombay High Court adjourned the Second Appeals (SA 233 & 234 of 2026) to 17th June 2026 to consider a substantial question regarding whether the Authority has power to review its order under Regulation 36 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Interim applications were taken on board, and respondents were permitted to withdraw the appellant's deposited amount upon furnishing an indemnity bond guaranteeing repayment with interest if appeals are decided in the appellant's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts