RAJENDRA @ RAJAN GANPAT MANKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — BA/2047/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010221732026

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

BA/9244/2026

Filing Date

29-04-2026

Registration No

BA/2047/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69,70
Protection of Children from Sexual offence Act 2012 Section 4,8

Petitioner(s)

RAJENDRA @ RAJAN GANPAT MANKAR

Adv. Abhilasha Pawar

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

XYZ

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

07-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

10-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

16-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Case Summary: BA/2047/2026 In this criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court, applicant Rajendra @ Rajan Ganpat Mankar sought bail relief. The court heard arguments on 7th May 2026 and issued notice to the respondents (State of Maharashtra and another party), returnable on 16th June 2026. The case was adjourned for substantive hearing, with directions to the Investigating Officer to inform Respondent No. 2 of the application's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/2047/2026 In this criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court, applicant Rajendra @ Rajan Ganpat Mankar sought bail relief. The court heard arguments on 7th May 2026 and issued notice to the respondents (State of Maharashtra and another party), returnable on 16th June 2026. The case was adjourned for substantive hearing, with directions to the Investigating Officer to inform Respondent No. 2 of the application's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case