NAGESH HARIBHAU PATIL vs SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND COMPTENT AUTHORITY AND ORS — WP/6836/2026
Case under National Highway Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010221712026
Filing Number
WP/12930/2026
Filing Date
29-04-2026
Registration No
WP/6836/2026
Registration Date
26-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAGESH HARIBHAU PATIL
Adv. Chintamani Kamlakar Bhangoji
Respondent(s)
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND COMPTENT AUTHORITY AND ORS
HARIBHAU KANHU PATIL, SINCE DECEASED THR HIS LHRS(Legal Heir)2.
PRAMILA HARIBHAU PATIL
Adv. P H Potnis2.
SOPAN HARIBHAU PATIL
Adv. P H Potnis2.
MOHAN HARIBHAU PATIL
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer of Bhiwandi Division to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's compensation disbursement objection filed in 2018, which was closed for orders in 2019 but no order was ever issued or recorded. The court made no determination on the merits, keeping all parties' rights open, and mandated the respondent pass the order within six weeks in accordance with law, with optional hearings for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer of Bhiwandi Division to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's compensation disbursement objection filed in 2018, which was closed for orders in 2019 but no order was ever issued or recorded. The court made no determination on the merits, keeping all parties' rights open, and mandated the respondent pass the order within six weeks in accordance with law, with optional hearings for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts