KANCHAN MAHADU KHANDARE vs TAHSILDAR 1 (SPECIAL BRANCH) OR COMPETENT AUTHORITY II AND ORS — WP/6382/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010221532026
Filing Number
WP/12916/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/6382/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
SLUM AREAS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANCHAN MAHADU KHANDARE
Adv. kishor walanju
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAHSILDAR 1 (SPECIAL BRANCH) OR COMPETENT AUTHORITY II AND ORS
-
2.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR (APPELLATE AUTHORITY OF THE SRA) MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT
-
3.CHIEF EXECUTOR OFFICER OF SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
4.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY (EAST AND WEST SUBURBAN) SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
5.SUNIL SHINDE
-
6.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THE PRINCIPAL OF SECRETARY HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
The High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner placed on record an order dated 27th April 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority, finding that subsequent developments rendered the petition moot. All contentions were kept open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6382/2026
The High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner placed on record an order dated 27th April 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority, finding that subsequent developments rendered the petition moot. All contentions were kept open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts