KUMARPAL K. OSWAL SHRI.A.A.KUMBHAKONI vs SURYAKANT G. SHINDE AND ORS. — WP/6515/2003

Case under Rent Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Jan-2005

CNR: HCBM010221432003

Filing Number

WP/14937/2003

Filing Date

19-Apr-2003

Registration No

WP/6515/2003

Registration Date

26-Sep-2003

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Rent Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUMARPAL K. OSWAL SHRI.A.A.KUMBHAKONI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURYAKANT G. SHINDE AND ORS.

    Adv. RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 SERVED. 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as abated. The petitioner had challenged a 2003 Appellate Court order upholding the Civil Judge Junior Division's jurisdiction under Section 9A of the CPC. Since Section 9A was subsequently deleted by the 2018 Maharashtra Amendment Act, and the statutory provision now provides that jurisdiction challenges stand abated once the court decides it has jurisdiction, the court found the petition abated by operation of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jan-2005

    Hon'ble Shri Justice F.I. RebelloView PDF

  4. 10-Jan-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Jan-2005

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice F.I. Rebello

  6. 19-Apr-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6515/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as abated. The petitioner had challenged a 2003 Appellate Court order upholding the Civil Judge Junior Division's jurisdiction under Section 9A of the CPC. Since Section 9A was subsequently deleted by the 2018 Maharashtra Amendment Act, and the statutory provision now provides that jurisdiction challenges stand abated once the court decides it has jurisdiction, the court found the petition abated by operation of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case