Yash Mahendra Bindra vs The University of Mumbai, Through its Vice Chancellor — WP/6142/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010220822026

e-Filing Number

26-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/12871/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6142/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Bench Type

Division

Category

EDUCATION ( 11 )

Sub-Category

EXAMINATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yash Mahendra Bindra

    Adv. NARGOLKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The University of Mumbai, Through its Vice Chancellor

  2. 2.The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education

  3. 3.The Directorate of Technical Education, Through its Director, Maharashtra State, Mumbai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court directed the University of Mumbai to decide the petitioner's representation by May 10, 2026, after the university failed to comply with a four-week deadline to consider it following a February 27, 2026 order. If the university finds merit in the representation, it must permit the petitioner to seek re-admission to the 2nd academic year of his course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court directed the University of Mumbai to decide the petitioner's representation by May 10, 2026, after the university failed to comply with a four-week deadline to consider it following a February 27, 2026 order. If the university finds merit in the representation, it must permit the petitioner to seek re-admission to the 2nd academic year of his course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case