GAUTAM PURSHOTTAM BUDRANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/6056/2026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010220602026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/12853/2026

Filing Date

29-04-2026

Registration No

WP/6056/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Division Bench ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

GAUTAM PURSHOTTAM BUDRANI

Adv. Minal Chandnani

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

TALATHI CIRCLE OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

07-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Summary: WP 6056/2026 - Gautam Purshottam Budrani v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer–Panvel to comply with the Additional Commissioner's April 11, 2023 order within 8 weeks. The petitioner complained that despite previous representations, the SDO had failed to implement the Commissioner's directions to re-inquire into the matter. The court emphasized that superior administrative orders must be followed in letter and spirit and empowered the Commissioner to ensure compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: WP 6056/2026 - Gautam Purshottam Budrani v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer–Panvel to comply with the Additional Commissioner's April 11, 2023 order within 8 weeks. The petitioner complained that despite previous representations, the SDO had failed to implement the Commissioner's directions to re-inquire into the matter. The court emphasized that superior administrative orders must be followed in letter and spirit and empowered the Commissioner to ensure compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case