RUTU ENTERPRISES vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL — WP/8246/2025
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010220372025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WP/14138/2025
Filing Date
17-04-2025
Registration No
WP/8246/2025
Registration Date
23-06-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RUTU ENTERPRISES
Adv. C B Thakar
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL
THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
Adv. GP WRIT CELL
THE STATE TAX OFFICER, DECCAN GYMKHANA-701, PUNE
Adv. GP WRIT CELL
THE UNION OF INDIA THRO THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DGGI, PUNE ZONAL UNIT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-07-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 20-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/8246/2025 - Rutu Enterprises v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court (Bench of Justices M.S. Karnik and S.M. Modak) issued a procedural order on 29th April 2026 directing: (1) the court office to verify and list the petitions before the appropriate bench with subject matter assignment, and (2) removal from the board. The case was not decided on merits but remanded for proper assignment to the competent bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/8246/2025 - Rutu Enterprises v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court (Bench of Justices M.S. Karnik and S.M. Modak) issued a procedural order on 29th April 2026 directing: (1) the court office to verify and list the petitions before the appropriate bench with subject matter assignment, and (2) removal from the board. The case was not decided on merits but remanded for proper assignment to the competent bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts