ROHIT RAJENDRA CHANDEL vs SHRADDHA BHAGWANSINGH CHAUHAN — IA/3446/2026

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010219112026

Filing Number

IA/12779/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/3446/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT RAJENDRA CHANDEL

    Adv. ANURAG GHAG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRADDHA BHAGWANSINGH CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jul-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

    Case Summary: IA 3446/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Rohit Rajendra Chandel's interim application seeking condonation of a 23-day delay in filing a Family Court Appeal against the Family Court's judgment dated 05/01/2026. The court found the delay to be minuscule and was satisfied with the applicant's bonafides, approving prayers (a) and (b) of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3446/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA 3446/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Rohit Rajendra Chandel's interim application seeking condonation of a 23-day delay in filing a Family Court Appeal against the Family Court's judgment dated 05/01/2026. The court found the delay to be minuscule and was satisfied with the applicant's bonafides, approving prayers (a) and (b) of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case