HARISHCHANDRA SHANKAR PATIL SINCE DECD. THR. LRS(Legal Heir) vs THE NATIONAL HAGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REGIONAL OFFICE MUMBAI AND ORS Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL — WP/6453/2025

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010218252025

Filing Number

WP/13997/2025

Filing Date

17-Apr-2025

Registration No

WP/6453/2025

Registration Date

13-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARISHCHANDRA SHANKAR PATIL SINCE DECD. THR. LRS(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Simran Patil,C J JOVESON,C J JOVESON, ,C J JOVESON1.

  2. 2.VANDANA NARENDRA MHATRE1.

  3. 3.KALPESH HARISCHANDRA PATIL1.

  4. 4.TARABAI HARISHCHANDRA PATIL1.

  5. 5.SARITA RATNAKAR MHATRE1.

  6. 6.SWATI SRIDHAR PATIL1.

  7. 7.BHAVAN GIRIDHAR PATIL1.

  8. 8.SARASWATI NANDAKUMAR PATIL1.

  9. 9.VEDIKA AMIT MANGLE1.

  10. 10.SHITAL UMAKANT MHATRE1.

  11. 11.VAISHALI AJAY PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE NATIONAL HAGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REGIONAL OFFICE MUMBAI AND ORS Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL

  2. 2.THE AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR

  3. 3.THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICE

  4. 4.THE OFFICER OF DEPUTY SALT COMMISSONER

  5. 5.PIYUSH KUMAR INSPECTOR OF SALT

  6. 6.THE GOVERNMTN OF MAHARASHTAR

  7. 7.THE UNION OF INDIA

  8. 8.ABHAY DINKAR DHARKAR

    Adv. abhishek deshmukh

  9. 9.ARYAN RAHUL DHARKAR

  10. 10.ANUPAMA DHARKAR VANGADI

  11. 11.SUBHAGA DINKAR DHARKAR

  12. 12.NIKIT DINKAR DHARKAR

  13. 13.AARTI GIRISH DAPTARDAR

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Summary: The writ petition was adjourned for hearing on 12th June 2026 marked "High on Board." The court heard the petitioners' counsel and issued notice to respondents, with some respondents waiving notice. The petitioners are required to serve remaining respondents through private service and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  6. 11-Sep-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale , Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere

  7. 12-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale,hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF

  8. 12-Aug-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale , Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere

  9. 04-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale,hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF

  10. 04-Jul-2025

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale , Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere

  11. 13-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale,hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF

  12. 13-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 17-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6453/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The writ petition was adjourned for hearing on 12th June 2026 marked "High on Board." The court heard the petitioners' counsel and issued notice to respondents, with some respondents waiving notice. The petitioners are required to serve remaining respondents through private service and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case