PRASHANT UDAYKUMAR KADAM vs TAHSILDAR-1 (SPECIAL BRANCH) OR COMPETENT AUTH -II, SRA AND ORS — WP/6349/2026
Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010218152026
Filing Number
WP/12716/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/6349/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
SLUM AREAS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRASHANT UDAYKUMAR KADAM
Adv. kishor walanju
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAHSILDAR-1 (SPECIAL BRANCH) OR COMPETENT AUTH -II, SRA AND ORS
-
2.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, (APPELLATE AUTHORITY OF THE SRA)
-
3.CHIEF EXECUTOR OFFICE OF SLUM
-
4.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OP. SOC.
-
5.SUNIL SHINDE AS OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ASHTAVINAYAK SRA CO-OP. HOS. SOC. LTD.
-
6.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Prashant Udaykumar Kadam on 7th May 2026, finding that subsequent development (an order dated 27th April 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority) rendered the petition moot. The court held that nothing survived for consideration and disposed of the petition while keeping all contentions open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6349/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Prashant Udaykumar Kadam on 7th May 2026, finding that subsequent development (an order dated 27th April 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority) rendered the petition moot. The court held that nothing survived for consideration and disposed of the petition while keeping all contentions open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts