PRASHANT UDAYKUMAR KADAM vs TAHSILDAR-1 (SPECIAL BRANCH) OR COMPETENT AUTH -II, SRA AND ORS — WP/6349/2026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010218152026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/12716/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

WP/6349/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Sub-Category

SLUM AREAS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PRASHANT UDAYKUMAR KADAM

Adv. kishor walanju

Respondent(s)

TAHSILDAR-1 (SPECIAL BRANCH) OR COMPETENT AUTH -II, SRA AND ORS

THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, (APPELLATE AUTHORITY OF THE SRA)

CHIEF EXECUTOR OFFICE OF SLUM

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OP. SOC.

SUNIL SHINDE AS OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ASHTAVINAYAK SRA CO-OP. HOS. SOC. LTD.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

07-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Prashant Udaykumar Kadam on 7th May 2026, finding that subsequent development (an order dated 27th April 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority) rendered the petition moot. The court held that nothing survived for consideration and disposed of the petition while keeping all contentions open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Prashant Udaykumar Kadam on 7th May 2026, finding that subsequent development (an order dated 27th April 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority) rendered the petition moot. The court held that nothing survived for consideration and disposed of the petition while keeping all contentions open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case