PANKAJ NAVINCHANDRA KOTHARI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS. — IA/3469/2026

Case under Mah. Private Forest Acquisition Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010217622026

Filing Number

IA/12677/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/3469/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Private Forest Acquisition Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ NAVINCHANDRA KOTHARI

    Adv. SUKAND RAVINDRA KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court restored Interim Application No. 3469/2026 (Pankaj Navinchandra Kothari's writ petition) which had been dismissed by the Registrar for non-removal of office objections. The court found justiciable grounds for restoration, noting the applicant was under an erroneous assumption that objections had been removed when a conditional order was passed. The writ petition was restored and scheduled for hearing on 22/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3469/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court restored Interim Application No. 3469/2026 (Pankaj Navinchandra Kothari's writ petition) which had been dismissed by the Registrar for non-removal of office objections. The court found justiciable grounds for restoration, noting the applicant was under an erroneous assumption that objections had been removed when a conditional order was passed. The writ petition was restored and scheduled for hearing on 22/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case