SONEX vs The State of Maharashtra — WP/5990/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010216742026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

25-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/12622/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5990/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226 AND 227
DRUGS AND COSMETICS ACT Section ---
Drugs and Cosmetics Rules Section ---

Petitioner(s)

SONEX

Adv. DHARAN V GANDHI

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra

The Assistant Commissioner (Drugs), Mumbai Zone 3, and Greater Licensing Authority,

Joint Commissioner Food and Drug Administration, M S

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

04-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

The Bombay High Court disposed of SONEX's writ petition by directing that its appeal against a Competent Authority's order be heard by the Appellate Authority on an expedited basis. The court ordered SONEX to appear before the Appellate Authority and requested it to decide the appeal as soon as possible, or alternatively, to pass an appropriate order on SONEX's interim application for stay within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of SONEX's writ petition by directing that its appeal against a Competent Authority's order be heard by the Appellate Authority on an expedited basis. The court ordered SONEX to appear before the Appellate Authority and requested it to decide the appeal as soon as possible, or alternatively, to pass an appropriate order on SONEX's interim application for stay within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case