SUPARNA SURYAKANT SAWANT vs THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO OP. SOC. AND ORS — WP/6418/2026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Next hearing 13-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010216622026

Filing Number

WP/12616/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6418/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUPARNA SURYAKANT SAWANT

    Adv. SANGARE PRIYANKA SANDIP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO OP. SOC. AND ORS

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OP. SOCIETIES MUMBAI DIVISION MUMBAI

  3. 3.JAY VIJAY CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY

  4. 4.MURTAZA MOHAMMED MATCHESWALA

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Jul-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/6418/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on July 13, 2026, in Suparna Suryakant Sawant's writ petition challenging a cooperative housing society matter. The court found a prima facie discrepancy: a document dated August 11, 2016 appears notarized, but the Authority classified the membership agreement as a registered sale deed. Ad-interim relief was granted per prayer clause (c) pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6418/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6418/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on July 13, 2026, in Suparna Suryakant Sawant's writ petition challenging a cooperative housing society matter. The court found a prima facie discrepancy: a document dated August 11, 2016 appears notarized, but the Authority classified the membership agreement as a registered sale deed. Ad-interim relief was granted per prayer clause (c) pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case