YAMUNABAI VILAS MEDHE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/1153/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010216122026
Filing Number
ABA/9013/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
ABA/1153/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YAMUNABAI VILAS MEDHE
Adv. Rahul Kasliwal
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay granted anticipatory bail to 60-year-old Yamunabai Vilas Medhe in a case involving allegations that she held the deceased's shirt collar while a co-accused assaulted him with an iron pipe, resulting in death. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given her age, minimal direct involvement, and the complainant's settlement of the matter, approving bail on a ₹30,000 bond with conditions including attendance at police station as required and a charitable contribution to Tata Memorial Hospital. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
29-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/1153/2026
The High Court of Bombay granted anticipatory bail to 60-year-old Yamunabai Vilas Medhe in a case involving allegations that she held the deceased's shirt collar while a co-accused assaulted him with an iron pipe, resulting in death. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given her age, minimal direct involvement, and the complainant's settlement of the matter, approving bail on a ₹30,000 bond with conditions including attendance at police station as required and a charitable contribution to Tata Memorial Hospital. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts