SANI @ NANA BALASO PARDESHI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/1151/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010216012026
Filing Number
ABA/9007/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
ABA/1151/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANI @ NANA BALASO PARDESHI
Adv. Ghanasham Jadhav
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/1151/2026 The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sani @ Nana Balaso Pardeshi in Crime No. 213 of 2024 (assault with intent to kill), finding that his name was not mentioned in the original FIR and was added 3-4 days later. The court applied the principle of parity, noting that two co-accused with similar allegations had already been released on anticipatory bail, determining custodial interrogation unnecessary. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with one or two sureties in the like amount, subject to police attendance as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
29-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/1151/2026
Case Summary: ABA/1151/2026 The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sani @ Nana Balaso Pardeshi in Crime No. 213 of 2024 (assault with intent to kill), finding that his name was not mentioned in the original FIR and was added 3-4 days later. The court applied the principle of parity, noting that two co-accused with similar allegations had already been released on anticipatory bail, determining custodial interrogation unnecessary. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with one or two sureties in the like amount, subject to police attendance as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts