MR. LAKSHMIKANT DIGAMBAR JOSHI vs RUTURAJ CO-OP. HO.SOC.THR.ITS CHAIRMAN-KANTILAL S. MUNOT AND SECRETARY R. P. SHAH — AO/415/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010215482026

Filing Number

AO/12563/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

AO/415/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. LAKSHMIKANT DIGAMBAR JOSHI

    Adv. S C Wakankar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUTURAJ CO-OP. HO.SOC.THR.ITS CHAIRMAN-KANTILAL S. MUNOT AND SECRETARY R. P. SHAH

  2. 2.MR. SANTOSHBHAI LAKSHMIKANT JOSHI

  3. 3.MRS. RAJASHREE ANIL DESHPANDE

  4. 4.MRS. JAYASHREE PURUSHOTTAM KULKARNI

  5. 5.M/S NAMO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THR ITS PARTNERS MR SANTOSH BHIKCHAND BORA(Legal Heir)5.

  6. 6.MR. SANTOSH BHIKCHAND BORA5.

  7. 7.MRS. SANGEETA SANTOSH BORA

  8. 8.THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  9. 9.THE DEPUTY ENGINEER ZONE NO. 5

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    Case Summary: AO/415/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay permitted the conversion of an Appeal from Order into a Civil Revision Application on June 9, 2026. The appellant's counsel submitted that the wrong remedy was inadvertently filed, and the court granted liberty to correct this procedural error. The case was then placed before the appropriate court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/415/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO/415/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay permitted the conversion of an Appeal from Order into a Civil Revision Application on June 9, 2026. The appellant's counsel submitted that the wrong remedy was inadvertently filed, and the court granted liberty to correct this procedural error. The case was then placed before the appropriate court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case