SHUBHAM SHIVAJI LIMHAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/1155/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010215462026
Filing Number
ABA/8985/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
ABA/1155/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHUBHAM SHIVAJI LIMHAN
Adv. Vipul Dushing
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/1155/2026 Decision: The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Shubham Shivaji Limhan in Crime No. 118 of 2025 (assault and extortion allegations) on the principle of parity, since co-accused facing identical charges were already released on bail. Conditions: Applicant must execute a personal recognizance bond of ₹30,000 with one or two sureties of equal amount and attend police station as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
29-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/1155/2026
Case Summary: ABA/1155/2026 Decision: The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Shubham Shivaji Limhan in Crime No. 118 of 2025 (assault and extortion allegations) on the principle of parity, since co-accused facing identical charges were already released on bail. Conditions: Applicant must execute a personal recognizance bond of ₹30,000 with one or two sureties of equal amount and attend police station as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts