DHANRAJ SHIVAJI WANI AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THE. ITS SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND ORS — WP/6101/2026
Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010214482026
Filing Number
WP/12506/2026
Filing Date
27-04-2026
Registration No
WP/6101/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANRAJ SHIVAJI WANI AND ORS
Adv. Estling S Murge,Chintamani Kamlakar Bhangoji,Chintamani Kamlakar Bhangoji, ,Chintamani Kamlakar Bhangoji
SHIVAJI PANDIT GUNJAL
DHARMENDRA MANSARAM BAGUL
SULOCHANA ASHOK BHAMARE
JAISHREE KAILAS PATIL
SULOCHANA ASHOK BHAMARE
SANJAY BABURAO JAGTAP
BHAGWAN YADAV KUMAWAT
VIJAY LAXMAN AHIRE
RAMESH SUKHADEO KHAIRNAR
SANJIV WAMAN KHAIRNAR
ANANT YASHWANTRAO PAWAR
BAPUR DASHRATH AHIRE
DHARMA SAYAJI NAWALE
BHANUDAS SUKDEV MANDLIK
PRAVIN MADHAVRAO GUNJAL
PANDHARINATH HARI BORSE
VILAS SHIVAJI BACHHAV
SUNITA PANDITRAO AHIRE
DODHU BUDHA THAKRE
KESHAV DHARMAJI SONAWANE
DHANAJI RAJARAM WARUNGASE
SURESH BABURAO PATIL
SHOBHA RAMJI AHER
SAHEBRAO DAGA SOLUNKE
SAHEBRAO DAGA SOLUNKE
RAMESH RAGHUNATH AHER
TUKARAM GENU KADAM
HIMMAT BHAGAWAN PAGAR
KIRAN DAMODAR WAGH
BHILA DHARMA BAGUL
UTTAM BHAGWANT NIRBHAVANE
POPAT SHANKAR CHAVAN
LAXMAN BALIRAM SAWANT
SUBHASH KISANRAO LOHAKARE
MACHHINDRANATH NIVRUTTI WAGH
GANGADHAR BABURAO DHATRAK
SHIVAJI RAJARAM KOR
SHARDA SARJERAO SHINGARE
MANGALA GANPAT DESHMUKH
BALU KASHIRAM GANGURDE
SUSHILA SADASHIV MOKASHI
RAMDAS MOHAN DESALE
HARUN SHAIKH MOHIDDIN KURESHI
SUSHILA SHIVAJI AHER
SHIVAJI EKNATH AHER
VIJAYKUMAR RAMCHANDRA DEORE
KISHOR DAULATRAO JAGDALE
NIVRUTTI RAMDAS JAGTAP
PRAKASH HARI DHESALE
HEMANT RAMRAO PATIL
RAMESH PANDURANG KHAIRNAR
USHA BHAGCHAND AHIRE
MEERABAI RAMKRISHANA NIKAM
PRABHAKAR MOTIRAM GOSAVI
MAHARU BALIRAM MANKAR
RAVINDRA SONU AHIRE
KALPANA LAXMAN HIRE
JIBHAU KASHIRAM JADHAV
SUNANDA VINAYAK THOMBARE
BHIMRAJ DHONDIBA GODE
DADAJI KISAN DHULE
RAJENDRA DHARMA BAGUL
MAYU PANDHARINATH SHINDE
VASANT JOBHAU PAWAR
DATTATRAY MURLIDHAR WARANDAL
SHASHIPRABHA GOVIND GHAMANDI
RAVINDRA BHILA KAPADNIS
SITARAM NARAYAN KAPADNIS
BALASAHEB RAMBHAU KANADE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THE. ITS SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/6101/2026 Petitioners: 261 retired pensioners (including Dhanraj Shivaji Wani, Shivaji Pandit Gunjal, and Dharmendra Mansaram Bagul) from Nashik District Respondents: State of Maharashtra (Rural Development & Finance Departments), Zilla Parishad Nashik, and Education Officer Decision: Petition partly allowed The Bombay High Court ruled that petitioners who worked for 6 months or more in the final year before retirement are entitled to annual increments that accrued on June 30th (end of the fiscal year), even though they retired after office hours. The court directed recalculation of pensionary benefits including the earned increment, with arrears payable within 90 days. However, petitioners were denied interest due to late filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/6101/2026 Petitioners: 261 retired pensioners (including Dhanraj Shivaji Wani, Shivaji Pandit Gunjal, and Dharmendra Mansaram Bagul) from Nashik District Respondents: State of Maharashtra (Rural Development & Finance Departments), Zilla Parishad Nashik, and Education Officer Decision: Petition partly allowed The Bombay High Court ruled that petitioners who worked for 6 months or more in the final year before retirement are entitled to annual increments that accrued on June 30th (end of the fiscal year), even though they retired after office hours. The court directed recalculation of pensionary benefits including the earned increment, with arrears payable within 90 days. However, petitioners were denied interest due to late filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts