MANJEET SINGH SON OF UJAGAR SINGH vs THE CHIEF CONTROLLER REVENUE AUTHORITY AND ORS — WP/13113/2022

Case under Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010214302022

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/12728/2022

Filing Date

20-05-2022

Registration No

WP/13113/2022

Registration Date

09-11-2022

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

MANJEET SINGH SON OF UJAGAR SINGH

Adv. Charanjeet

Respondent(s)

THE CHIEF CONTROLLER REVENUE AUTHORITY AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

16-11-2022

FOR CIRCULATION

29-04-2026

FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)

23-07-2024

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

17-04-2024

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

20-02-2024

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

29-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Summary of WP/13113/2022 The Bombay High Court allowed Manjeet Singh's petition and directed refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- in stamp duty. Singh had mistakenly purchased e-stamps under the wrong scheme code ("consolidated stamp duty" instead of "non-judicial stamps") in March 2018, making the stamps unusable for his flat purchase agreement. Although his refund application was filed 2 months 8 days late (beyond the 6-month statutory limit under Section 48(3) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act), the court found that delay alone cannot defeat a legitimate right to refund of incorrectly paid tax, especially where the government would unjustly enrich itself. The court set aside rejections by both the Collector of Stamps and Chief Controller Revenue Authority, emphasizing that expiry of limitation bars the remedy but not the right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/13113/2022 The Bombay High Court allowed Manjeet Singh's petition and directed refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- in stamp duty. Singh had mistakenly purchased e-stamps under the wrong scheme code ("consolidated stamp duty" instead of "non-judicial stamps") in March 2018, making the stamps unusable for his flat purchase agreement. Although his refund application was filed 2 months 8 days late (beyond the 6-month statutory limit under Section 48(3) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act), the court found that delay alone cannot defeat a legitimate right to refund of incorrectly paid tax, especially where the government would unjustly enrich itself. The court set aside rejections by both the Collector of Stamps and Chief Controller Revenue Authority, emphasizing that expiry of limitation bars the remedy but not the right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case