MANJEET SINGH SON OF UJAGAR SINGH vs THE CHIEF CONTROLLER REVENUE AUTHORITY AND ORS — WP/13113/2022
Case under Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010214302022
Filing Number
WP/12728/2022
Filing Date
20-05-2022
Registration No
WP/13113/2022
Registration Date
09-11-2022
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANJEET SINGH SON OF UJAGAR SINGH
Adv. Charanjeet
Respondent(s)
THE CHIEF CONTROLLER REVENUE AUTHORITY AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
FOR CIRCULATION
FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-11-2022 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 29-04-2026 | FIRST ON BOARD (FOB) |
| 23-07-2024 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 17-04-2024 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 20-02-2024 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary of WP/13113/2022 The Bombay High Court allowed Manjeet Singh's petition and directed refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- in stamp duty. Singh had mistakenly purchased e-stamps under the wrong scheme code ("consolidated stamp duty" instead of "non-judicial stamps") in March 2018, making the stamps unusable for his flat purchase agreement. Although his refund application was filed 2 months 8 days late (beyond the 6-month statutory limit under Section 48(3) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act), the court found that delay alone cannot defeat a legitimate right to refund of incorrectly paid tax, especially where the government would unjustly enrich itself. The court set aside rejections by both the Collector of Stamps and Chief Controller Revenue Authority, emphasizing that expiry of limitation bars the remedy but not the right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WP/13113/2022 The Bombay High Court allowed Manjeet Singh's petition and directed refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- in stamp duty. Singh had mistakenly purchased e-stamps under the wrong scheme code ("consolidated stamp duty" instead of "non-judicial stamps") in March 2018, making the stamps unusable for his flat purchase agreement. Although his refund application was filed 2 months 8 days late (beyond the 6-month statutory limit under Section 48(3) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act), the court found that delay alone cannot defeat a legitimate right to refund of incorrectly paid tax, especially where the government would unjustly enrich itself. The court set aside rejections by both the Collector of Stamps and Chief Controller Revenue Authority, emphasizing that expiry of limitation bars the remedy but not the right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts