BALARK VASANT RAUT AND ORS vs TAHSILDAR ALIBAG DISTRICT RAIGAD AND ORS — WP/7395/2026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010213922026

Filing Number

WP/12476/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/7395/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Division Bench ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALARK VASANT RAUT AND ORS

    Adv. Rohit D Joshi

  2. 2.MAHESH SITARAM PADTE

  3. 3.DIPIKA MAHESH MHATRE

  4. 4.SANTOSH PARSHURAM PADTE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAHSILDAR ALIBAG DISTRICT RAIGAD AND ORS

  2. 2.THE CIRCLE OFFICER ALIBAG

  3. 3.THE COLLECTOR RAIGAD

  4. 4.GROUP GRAM PANCHAYAT BORIS GUNJIS THROUGH SARPANCH

  5. 5.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH REVENUE DEPARTMENT

  6. 6.MAHANAGAR GAS LTD

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) heard Writ Petition No. 7395 of 2026 on 15th June 2026. The Court ordered the Registry to verify the petition and place the matter before the appropriate Court for further proceedings. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7395/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) heard Writ Petition No. 7395 of 2026 on 15th June 2026. The Court ordered the Registry to verify the petition and place the matter before the appropriate Court for further proceedings. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case