PRAJWAL PRAKASH MHATRE vs SHITAL PRAJWAL MHATRE — IA/3279/2026

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010212932026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/12409/2026

Filing Date

24-04-2026

Registration No

IA/3279/2026

Registration Date

27-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Bench Type

Single

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

PRAJWAL PRAKASH MHATRE

Adv. Vikrant Khare

Respondent(s)

SHITAL PRAJWAL MHATRE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

30-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

06-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

28-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Case Summary: IA/3279/2026 The High Court of Bombay rejected the father's (Prajwal Prakash Mhatre) interim application seeking custody of the child during school vacation, finding his conduct contemptuous and harassing. The court noted the father's inconsistent stance—initially offering to pay maintenance arrears but later claiming inability to pay (₹2.49-4.69 lakhs)—and expressed doubts about his capacity to maintain the child given his poor financial condition. The matter was adjourned to 9th June 2026 for the regular court's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3279/2026 The High Court of Bombay rejected the father's (Prajwal Prakash Mhatre) interim application seeking custody of the child during school vacation, finding his conduct contemptuous and harassing. The court noted the father's inconsistent stance—initially offering to pay maintenance arrears but later claiming inability to pay (₹2.49-4.69 lakhs)—and expressed doubts about his capacity to maintain the child given his poor financial condition. The matter was adjourned to 9th June 2026 for the regular court's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case